excluding a [pattr] object

    Feb 12 2006 | 11:02 pm
    I use pattr to bind to a remote variable. In this little patch I want to
    store the bindto target and its range mapping. What I DON'T want to store is
    the value inside the [pattr] object, because it reflects a remote value.
    Problem: I can't exclude the [pattr] object from the parent system that is
    used to store the other named objects in the patch.
    Is there a way to exclude a pattr object? (autopattr 2nd outlet doesn't work
    like it does with regular named objects)
    workaround 1: put the actual [pattr] somewhere else and work with s/r pairs.
    This is not a solution I like, because I'm talking about a lot of parameters
    workaround 2: put pattr in a subpatch and block the parent pattrsystem by
    putting a "dummy" pattrstorage inside the subpatcher containing the [pattr].
    Not very pretty either....
    I'd love to hear a clean way of doing this. Hope I make sense.

    • Feb 13 2006 | 8:12 am
      I understand the problem you are having, but I'm not understanding
      why you need to exclude the pattr. Typically, one uses pattr in order
      to make a value available to pattrstorage -- if you don't want to use
      the value in pattrstorage, you send the "active" message to psto to
      disable the object in question. If that's no help, you're going to
      need to be more specific about what you are trying to do, please.
      It sometimes is helpful for us if you step back and try to explain
      the larger goal you are trying to achieve, since we might be able to
      suggest alternative solutions that aren't obvious from a very narrow
    • Feb 13 2006 | 10:50 am
      Thanks again Jeremy, active is my friend:-) I'm using pattr to bind to
      parameters that already have their own pattrstorage system. Modifications
      are stored there, not at the controller side. That's why.
      Best, T_