Hi ,

I have also this problem , but it's new , i never had before...

I do this system and now it's working but it's not very handy.

shit,

your system doesn´t work in my patch!!!

Whats that? The envelope drawed in the function object stops at the second point and holds this value to end! I have´nt it also never bevor...

I neeeed some help, please.

here is a screenshot of my problem:

New System to work with functions with Line-Output-Format:

Look at the picture... So, it works for me... But its not the solution. I generate MANUALLY A LINE FROM 0 to 4000 ms an put it in the left input. So the line runs manually and the output is a dataflow of corresponding Y values for each point!!

In my opinnion the function object is buggy!!! Does anyone have an other solution?

Dear hgh

You have points with sustain, this will cause line~ to stop until you send next messages to function. You could deactivate the clicksustain attribute to prevent function from creating sustained points.

Whats the way to deactivate the clicksustain attribute to prevent function from creating sustained points ???

In the inspector i don´t the any attributes...

Here the screenshot of my function-object:

Like I said, clicksustain so uncheck Allows Changing Sustain by Clicking. You can also use the clearsustain message to remove the sustain state of every points.

HGH: screenshots are not that useful. Post the problem part of your patch, so that people can see what's really wrong.

I don't think that "the function object is buggy." I think there are just some issues with your patch.

That said, I would really love to see a new rule for function that would only allow one sustain point. When you added a sustain point the previous sustain, if any, would loose it's sustain status.

With autosustain activated you can have the "one before the last" point automatically sustained.

I have the same problem (after having read the previous posts...) Please, help me!

@albertocarretero it's a different issue:

line doesn't support multi segment. You'll find plenty of abstraction out there to fix the problem. ej.line from the ejies does this.