jit.phys.multiple


    Sep 15 2012 | 10:30 am
    I was trying to reproduce the patch in the the jit.phys.multiple help file. I end up with a slightly different result. Would anybody know why this is? I guess it is to do with any of the attributes.

    • Sep 17 2012 | 5:39 pm
      you have a typo in the jit.expr object in "multiple": jit.expr @expr snorm[0}*4 snorm[1]*4 snorm[2]*4
      that curly right bracket should be straight.