massive jit.net flow vs soundflower routing audio ?


    Jan 06 2014 | 5:41 pm
    Hi there, I have couple of ways to do what I want to do. I only tried one but I'd like to know, globally, which one could be the less worst approach if not the best ;)
    My system is based on jit.catch~ popping out matrix to the visual generator of my system.
    Options could be (non exhaustive of course): - jit.catch~ in M4L popping out matrices via jit.net. to visual generator - soundflower (64 channels version) routing audio into visual generator that also contains jit.catch~ - all in M4L (never my preferred approaches)
    I have no more but no less than 16 channels
    Both first seems efficient, but I'd like to have your opinions here.
    Thanks.