Peter Ostry

I think I have done this some time ago but now I can't get it to work:

----> 8 identical and named bpatchers with [autopattr]

The lowest bpatchers are seen by pattrstorage, stored, and all values are written to disk, I see them in the XML file. But at recall the elements of the 8 bpatchers are not set.

The [autopattr] object is not connected, but connecting the left output to the bpatcher elements does not help. Same result.

If I copy an element outside the lowest bpatchers, to bring it a level higher, it works.

Top patcher with [pattrstorage]
--> 1 bpatcher with [autopattr] and
----> 8 identical and named bpatchers with [autopattr]

The lowest bpatchers are seen by pattrstorage, stored, and all values are written to disk, I see them in the XML file. But at recall the elements of the 8 bpatchers are not set. 

The [autopattr] object is  not connected, but connecting the left output to the bpatcher elements does not help. Same result.
 
If I copy an element outside the lowest bpatchers, to bring it a level higher, it works.

I think I have done this some time ago but now I can't get it to work:
Top patcher with [pattrstorage]
--> 1 bpatcher with [autopattr] and
-

nested-bpatcher-not-set-by-pattrstorage

Seem to have more problems with Max and got to check my system.

I cancel the question.
Seem to have more problems with Max and got to check my system.

No @greedy in this case. I wanted pattrstorage to see everything and store values of all bpatchers.

The problem was somewhere else, did not find it and the technique was not good anyway. I changed the method. Now each bpatcher has it's own pattrstorage and I show/hide the top level bpatchers on demand. bpatcher nesting is one level only, works well and multiple pattrstorage are better for this specific project.

nested bpatcher not set by pattrstorage