poly~ as replacement of mute~


    Feb 11 2013 | 12:40 pm
    Hi there i just noticed poly~ replaced mute~ (i know i was lost into supercollider for a while...) now it says mute~ is obsolete and it's better to use poly~. In my case i have just a simple framefreezer subpatch does it make sense to use poly~ even if i have no polyphony? How am i supposed to use that? Any examples out there? Cheers Alberto

    • Feb 11 2013 | 12:45 pm
      Hi Can we see your framefreezer?
      Brendan
    • Feb 11 2013 | 12:50 pm
      sure here it is, i'm building a chain of effects for live impro, so i would like to kill the processes when not used All files should be there.. A
    • Feb 11 2013 | 1:19 pm
      Hi thanks for sharing - nice! I guess the applicability of poly~ depends on what you wish to do. I use it almost exclusively for polyphony but you can mute activity independently, down/up sample and other stuff. If you look at the helpfile for [thispoly] it describes how to mute/unmute individual voices based on a 0. or 1. signal or message.
      hth
      Brendan
    • Feb 11 2013 | 1:27 pm
      hi Brandan thanks for the help, but isn't it overshooting to use polyphony just to stop processing in a subpatch? I will try it and tell you if i have some problems.. Thanks A