joshualeeginsburg

I need to compile 8 smaller (40 x 30) video matrices in one 320 x 240 matrix. at the moment im doing this by [jit.op @op max] video_1 and video_2, then Video_12 and Video_3 then Video_123 and Video_4 etc.

i need to achieve this result much faster. is there a better more efficient way?

I need to compile 8 smaller (40 x 30) video matrices in one 320 x 240 matrix. at the moment im doing this by [jit.op @op max] video_1 and video_2, then Video_12 and Video_3 then Video_123 and Video_4 etc. 

adding-multiple-matrices

Hmm i don't understand your solution, won't @op max just select the brightest source pixel out of the 2 video's? Or do you input all matrixes of 320x240 size with only a small part actually used? That doesn't sound too efficient...

[jit.glue] was designed to do this, but I don't know how fast it is, something in the back of my mind tells me it's not lightning-fast...try it anyway. GL.

thanks for the reply. jit.glue does the job really nicely.

however now i have a strange problem: Im moving video around the larger screen according to an organized pattern. when i trigger each sequence with a bang (manually) it behaves really nicely, stepping through the sequence perfectly. However when i initiate the sequence using metro or tempo, elements often lag behind. when i tap 'bang' far faster than the tempo or metro are running i have no problems, but when either is connected, there is lag.

thanks for the reply. jit.glue does the job really nicely. 

it sounds like you the cpu can't keep up.

this kind of thing is usually best achieved with opengl, for performance reasons. several different ways to approach this, the easiest probably being using a videoplane for each movie.

look at the transform_reset attribute, and then use scale and position attributes to place your screens.

also, what codec, size, qt.movie settings, etc.

other than that, you'll probably have to post a simple patch that demonstrates your problem

it sounds like you the cpu can't keep up.
this kind of thing is usually best achieved with opengl, for performance reasons.  several different ways to approach this, the easiest probably being using a videoplane for each movie.

other than that, you'll probably have to post a simple patch that demonstrates your problem


thanks for your assistance. although it could be the cpu, im still curious why when i manually bang it through the sequence (faster than the metro or tempo speeds) it works fine, but when automated by using metro or temp, it lags.

Ive attached the patch if you have a chance to have a look.

Just load the 8 movies in and then next to the movie window you'll see the large 'bang' with the metro and tempo connected.

thanks for your assistance. although it could be the cpu, im still curious why when i manually bang it through the sequence (faster than the metro or tempo speeds) it works fine, but when automated by using metro or temp, it lags. 

Just load the 8 movies in and then next to the movie window you'll see the large 'bang' with the metro and tempo connected. 

...forgot to tell you to put a pattern into the matrix control object.

why are all your qt.movies at 320 x 240 when they only need to be 1/8 that size? you can also try @unique 1 on your qt.movies.

other than that your patch worked as expected for me. didn't see any "lag".

why are all your qt.movies at 320 x 240 when they only need to be 1/8 that size? you can also try @unique 1 on your qt.movies. 

other than that your patch worked as expected for me. didn't see any "lag".


Adding multiple matrices