Francois Weber

It's something I'd like to consider, but the internal data

configuration is a bit peculiar. I'm going to look into it at some

near date, but it is a pretty intense (and heavily variant) data

On Dec 13, 2004, at 7:38 PM, Nathan Wolek wrote:

> Would it ever be possible to get [jit.cellblock] married into the

> I am sure it's no easy task, but would be so sweet.

> Or is the dataset just too darn complex?

> Assistant Professor of Music Technology

It was on Dec 13, 2004, at 5:26 PM ...
What about cellblock & pattr today ?

It's something I'd like to consider, but the internal data
configuration is a bit peculiar. I'm going to look into it at some
near date, but it is a pretty intense (and heavily variant) data
structure to be managed in this way.

> Would it ever be possible to get [jit.cellblock] married into the
> [pattr] family?
> I am sure it's no easy task, but would be so sweet.
> Or is the dataset just too darn complex?
>
> --Nathan
>
> -------------------
> Nathan Wolek --- wolek@hawaii.edu
> Assistant Professor of Music Technology
> University of Hawaii at Manoa
> http;//www.nathanwolek.com


cellblock-pattr

Has anything changed with this issue? is jit.cellblock still not compatible with pattr ?