multiple messages to route
Is this this a good way to send multiple simultaneous messages to "route"? It works OK, but I worry that it will bottleneck at the "p thru". Perhaps "unpack" is preferable to "route" since it takes a single list? Any thoughts greatly appreciated.
[attachment=200766,4273]
Why do you need all the stuff between unpack and the values’ final destination?
Good question! The top part is for a interface/GUI, and the bottom part is for the subpatched instrument/effect. I’ll try to update that tonight.
it makes absolutely no difference if three messages are "sent" via one or via three connections, it is the same thing.
Really? That's good to know. Would that be OK with 100 connections, being updated frequently?
Here's the updated patch photo
[attachment=200770,4275]
