jirko

Presumed we have a masterphase running at a 4/4 time signature,

We get a count of four steps, but each sequencer has 32 steps and were only using the first four steps of the sequence. What should I have to do to get 32 steps at 4/4?

Presumed we have a  masterphase running at a  4/4 time signature,
We get a count of four steps, but each sequencer has 32 steps and  were only using the first four steps of the sequence. What should I have to do to get 32 steps at 4/4?
Do I have to scale the phase again?

noobie-question-about-timing-and-sequencing

you may have answered the question yourself, but it would help to see the patch for some detail

ps, the beauty of Max is, there's no such thing as a noobie (i think)

Only a newbie would say "there's no such thing as a noobie" :-)

when i meant was, the Max community is (largely) one of the most egalitarian and non-elitist resources there is: we all contribute on an equal basis, with a shared goal. But at last, a clear definition of 'noobie', thanks.

@Chris
when i meant was, the Max community is (largely) one of the most egalitarian and non-elitist resources there is: we all contribute on an equal basis, with a shared goal. But at last, a clear definition of 'noobie', thanks.


I'm enjoying my time as a noob, inspiration is everywhere!

Anyway..........re the original question, if it was me, I would scale the output of phasor~ again ([phasor~ ] > [*~ 32 ] > [trunc~ ]) like you suggested and go from there. As long as you make sure that every 8th step == 1 crotchet/quarter-note of the original tempo it will work fine.

Anyway..........re the original question, if it was me, I would scale the output of phasor~ again ([phasor~ ] > [*~ 32 ] > [trunc~ ]) like you suggested and go from there.  As long as you make sure that every 8th step == 1 crotchet/quarter-note of the original tempo it will work fine.


noobie question about timing and sequencing