mattyo

I've been trying to use zigzag~ as a kind of envelope generator (and 

yes, I have good reasons for not using adsr~). However, if I send it 

a set of values, it triggers every time I change them. My preference 

would be to change them when I'm in the mood, but trigger the zigzag 

at my leisure. Out of habit, I tried prepending "set" to the list, 

only to discover that zigzag doesn't understand set. this seems 

rather unmaxlike of it. So, I have two questions:

1. Is there any particular reason it doesn't understand set, and 

could I encourage one of the C74 geniuses to add a line of code for 

2. Given the absence of it, is there any other way I could get a list 

I've been trying to use zigzag~ as a kind of envelope generator (and  
yes, I have good reasons for not using adsr~).  However, if I send it  
a set of values, it triggers every time I change them. My preference  
would be to change them when I'm in the mood, but trigger the zigzag  
at my leisure.  Out of habit, I tried prepending "set" to the list,  
only to discover that zigzag doesn't understand set.  this seems  
rather unmaxlike of it.  So, I have two questions:

1.  Is there any particular reason it doesn't understand set, and  
could I encourage one of the C74 geniuses to add a line of code for  
the next release?

2. Given the absence of it, is there any other way I could get a list  
in without triggering output?

setting-parameters-with-zigzag

On Aug 7, 2006, at 6:55 PM, mattyo wrote:

> 1. Is there any particular reason it doesn't understand set, and 

> could I encourage one of the C74 geniuses to add a line of code for 

> 2. Given the absence of it, is there any other way I could get a 

Serialize the list as a set of pairs and use setindex

> 1.  Is there any particular reason it doesn't understand set, and  
> could I encourage one of the C74 geniuses to add a line of code for  
> the next release?

> 2. Given the absence of it, is there any other way I could get a  
> list in without triggering output?

Serialize the list as a set of pairs and use setindex
value>

>> 2. Given the absence of it, is there any other way I could get a 

> Serialize the list as a set of pairs and use setindex 

>> 2. Given the absence of it, is there any other way I could get a  
>> list in without triggering output?
>
> Serialize the list as a set of pairs and use setindex   
>
>
> -Joshua
>
>


setting parameters with zigzag~