Scott Fitzgerald

I'm successfully bringing in a 1080i video stream using a Kona LHe

capture card. The camera I'm using is sending a 1080i stream, and the

card is sending its stream to Jitter as such.

using the singlefield attribute in jit.qt.grab, i would expect to be

able to get a deinterlaced image, however it doesn't seem to have any

effect. downsampling and then interpolating up works, but is taxing

the cpu. Any suggestions of how else to remedy this process?

I'm successfully bringing in a 1080i video stream using a Kona LHe
capture card.  The camera I'm using is sending a 1080i stream, and the
card is sending its stream to Jitter as such.

using the singlefield attribute in jit.qt.grab, i would expect to be
able to get a deinterlaced image, however it doesn't seem to have any
effect.  downsampling and then interpolating up works, but is taxing
the cpu.  Any suggestions of how else to remedy this process?

singlefield-jit-qt-grab-1080i

On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Scott Fitzgerald wrote:

> using the singlefield attribute in jit.qt.grab, i would expect to be

> able to get a deinterlaced image, however it doesn't seem to have any

> effect. downsampling and then interpolating up works, but is taxing

> the cpu. Any suggestions of how else to remedy this process?

If you upsample by using as a texture, it should be faster than doing 

on the CPU, but I don't believe that jit.qt.movie @singlefield 1 is 

typically any faster than downsampling/upsampling with interpolation 

> using the singlefield attribute in jit.qt.grab, i would expect to be
> able to get a deinterlaced image, however it doesn't seem to have any
> effect.  downsampling and then interpolating up works, but is taxing
> the cpu.  Any suggestions of how else to remedy this process?

If you upsample by using as a texture, it should be faster than doing  
on the CPU, but I don't believe that jit.qt.movie @singlefield 1 is  
typically any faster than downsampling/upsampling with interpolation  
disabled.

singlefield, jit.qt.grab, 1080i