jvkr

Patch below shows that playing rather slowly the content of a buffer using groove, results in the extreme values being changed. What goes in in the range -1 to 1, while playing this range actually goes beyond -1 to 1. Is this the side effect of interpolation?

slow-groove-changes-the-values

As am addition, all speeds except for original speed have an effect on the values generated from groove. The context where this is relevant is a recorded control signal of which the values I expected to be in a specific range--the range that was recorded. It took me a while to discover why what I patched didn't work as expected.

As am addition, all speeds except for original speed have an effect on the values generated from groove. The context where this is relevant is a recorded control signal of which the values I expected to be in a specific range--the range that was recorded. It took me a while to discover why what I patched didn't work as expected.
_
johan


> Is this the side effect of interpolation?

Yes, if you don't want cubic interpolation, you should use index~ to

read out, or wave~, with interp 2. It seems that interp 1 isn't the same

as in groove~ and play~, I would expect a cubic interpolation of noise

jvkr schrieb:
> Is this the side effect of interpolation?

Yes, if you don't want cubic interpolation, you should use index~ to
read out, or wave~, with interp 2. It seems that interp 1 isn't the same
as in groove~ and play~, I would expect a cubic interpolation of noise
to produce higher values...

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com

Slow groove changes the values