personal_username

I'm trying to optimize CPU usage of a patch which is mainly about sending MIDI data to a vst~ sampler.

I've been thinking of going poly~ since forever, as i know it can use multicores, thus lowering the total CPU required by the patch.

Only thing is I don't know if a poly~ implementation would make a sense given my patch.

Below is a structural representation of my patch: what do you think about it?

Hi All!
I'm trying to optimize CPU usage of a patch which is mainly about sending MIDI data to a vst~ sampler.
I've been thinking of going poly~ since forever, as i know it can use multicores, thus lowering the total CPU required by the patch. 

Only thing is I don't know if a poly~ implementation would make a sense given my patch.
So, I'm here for help.
Below is a structural representation of my patch: what do you think about it?

it's hard to tell, but the "...OR THIS ?" structuration is probably hte best one. However, i'm not certain that loading that much vst objects will be lighter for your patch. But creating the notes outside the poly~ is theoretically the way to go.

if a vst~ plug-in requires 90% of your CPU then it is about time to raise the vectorsize from the smallest possible to the highest value, so that it is in snyc with the hardware IOs vector. e.g. 512/512. [vst~ 16 "NI Korrupt"] will require about 0.01% CPU if you do that.

@ROMAN: I'll try to tinker with it, but by 90% I meant a relative percentage of the total amount needed by my patch, not an absolute related to global CPU. Actually my patch requires something like 40%, and almost 30% of it comes from vst~. So my wish to reduce it significantly. ;-)

@VICHUG: thanks, this was my bet ;-)
@ROMAN: I'll try to tinker with it, but by 90% I meant a relative percentage of the total amount needed by my patch, not an absolute related to global CPU. Actually my patch requires something like 40%, and almost 30% of it comes from vst~. So my wish to reduce it significantly. ;-)


Help with Structure