wave~ is noisy when changing the start or end loop positions
I’m afraid everything is in the title…
Open wave~‘s helpfile, set the period of the phasor to 2200 (step 4 in the helpfile) to have Anton played more or less at the right speed.
Then start to change the start or end position of the loop, you’ll get nice clicks. Sending signals (even smoothed) doesn’t help.
This happens under OSX, with Max5, Max6 and Max6.1!!
Please don’t tell me I should use groove~! I just wanted to build a palindrome looper…
In my own experience (confirmed under Max 6 with students last week), play~is much more reliable (please note I haven’t mentioned groove~).
Merci pour ta proposition but…
I prefer a phasor driven object.
And speaking about play~, I invite you to try to new loop feature, especially the interpolation time setting. I don’t know if it’s suppose to dramaticalle enhance the quality of the loop (like groove~‘s resample is supposed to do), but it seems curious to me!
Anyway, I think I will build my palimdrome looper with 2 grooves…
Sorry, I had a very bad day using Max today!
You can use play with a phasor, like in the example below.
If you need durations I suggest gen ( > duration, history, accum)
Let me know if you need an example of that.
-- Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. --Copy all of the following text. Then, in Max, select New From Clipboard.----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 732.3ocyX0ziaCBD8ryuBKN1lFYveDmptG589OnpphDSxxJarkgrMaWs42dg w1JY2Z2P7Fi5EPLAO7l2.OFxyy7PqKOvjH+O6+ceOumm44AlLF7ZG6gJnG1j SkvzPayKE6KPya9ox8pblR8TEqwGlelpPy8QqohcH+ezNO8mvE5YB9.2Zbao PInEvmh9ZMml241JpZy8bwteVy1nZ7Ld4xEAy8wIAltXnknaOeIZPCrFjVq7 Lv6kqe3S3UmbesdYUr5exDz04..BNCTR9uAaXxh.i0WlMyzL2RJRtorhcD0W nSFN.CIwPLEAgFN7T2.gXPOgXBZD3Uv9k9i6vqhc.PD5K2czOXvDsjuSnSX8 mgIiICSZRssY3nHfMvCF93dBeLpurX3nxhCvJYrbE833nE76gVHv9+njQPKA SOsTcOUVVezG69MLovNkjUWOwrZ54EsbXFHENDsbq0ICAUj3PfSFwYnTGbDh t4eqNNlKFhHDSW3k1Fzip4xoOj+fVJcQrCOazxJgo.qDEe8aDRldVQRKpjpx B4E0Sm2UYwsuhBRi9Q5knndpnH1ATDe2nEUeWrRPzXutIZ5YkOd2Q2eVpqxr .x0yIg2PNofIkzcr+hTpYzL+r58EeqrrZAkucPJ5VRNM22j1TbNFTeMs1SMD GH+td+1sLc0IU4zmJXt+wKMjDFCcqVd8JMDGbsrgbtHEcROdhdfWXHzsBe8j TnMJOf6P4bwae1K.Ii8Wybxx80a5h9tmQ5eBUYLohKnJdo3rIE8p4bOOKiIN u5iLtz7vS.68mBsFNAV.GyCibEdvVfGsbnO9+G3ne1rqnGa177lT5TBmTKfi Qf1Qv4MK0.3I0Y3IwB3rzY6ksEMtgaBir.Nt6fUrMxNtSVNzB3D6LzDYol7X PSyEpzppGY0xVWB.QWzwCk0lgIyggbQyPn7.c4pOx6lObYNhVqqIPoKHXecS ICGRM+el504kY+Qondi8 -----------end_max5_patcher-----------
@ullrich. Thanks for your comment. In Max5 your patch will unfortunately only work nicely with samples shorter than ±6 minutes. You’ll have to use hr.play~ for longer samples.
My topic was more a complain about wave~ and as nobody from c74 commented my post, I’ll soon introduce an official bug report!
Forums > MaxMSP