Weird coll problem.
I store a value in coll with a symbol. I then immediately retrieve that value and 'set' the object which created it. This is so that the object and the coll stay in sync when modified separately. I am using route as more than one value is stored in the coll but for simplicity I have only put one in the patch.
Though, even using deferlow, I still don't get expected behavior. Here's a patch, try adding deferlow between 't b' and 'symbol file':
hi
use pak instead of pack, with zl reg to do the trick :
works here, i think...
cheers
g
2008/11/26 fairesigneaumachiniste
>
> I store a value in coll with a symbol. I then immediately retrieve that
> value and 'set' the object which created it. This is so that the object and
> the coll stay in sync when modified separately. I am using route as more
> than one value is stored in the coll but for simplicity I have only put one
> in the patch.
>
> Though, even using deferlow, I still don't get expected behavior. Here's a
> patch, try adding deferlow between 't b' and 'symbol file':
>
>
>
>
>
sorry i answered a bit too quickly
here is the correct solution i propose :
g
2008/11/26 Guillaume Evrard
> hi
>
> use pak instead of pack, with zl reg to do the trick :
>
>
>
> works here, i think...
>
> cheers
>
> g
>
> 2008/11/26 fairesigneaumachiniste
>
>
>> I store a value in coll with a symbol. I then immediately retrieve that
>> value and 'set' the object which created it. This is so that the object and
>> the coll stay in sync when modified separately. I am using route as more
>> than one value is stored in the coll but for simplicity I have only put one
>> in the patch.
>>
>> Though, even using deferlow, I still don't get expected behavior. Here's a
>> patch, try adding deferlow between 't b' and 'symbol file':
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Thanks for your replies but neither of those solutions work for me.
I'll find another way.
Fixed it. Just needed a buddy object in front of pack.