hans w. koch

trying to collect data into a zl queue and make a list of them via zl group.

either (most likely) i am doing something very stupid here or uncle max does...

trying to collect data into a zl queue and make a list of them via zl group.
either (most likely) i am doing something very stupid here or uncle max does...

zl-queue-and-group-no-happy-team

 will refresh its second outlet everytime it receives a bang. This works better (I just changed 1 patchcord):

zl queue will refresh its second outlet everytime it receives a bang. This works better (I just changed 1 patchcord):


still puzzled, why the original doesn´t work.

methinks it shouldn´t trouble zl group to recieve different lenghts before it actually recieves the data.

thank you, patrick,
it works indeed!
still puzzled, why the original doesn´t work.
methinks it shouldn´t trouble zl group to recieve different lenghts before it actually recieves the data.

 probably forgets what it received in its left inlet when it receives a value in its right inlet.

zl group probably forgets what it received in its left inlet when it receives a value in its right inlet.

yeah, patrick, i figured it out meanwhile.

i forgot to account for zl queue counting down while giving out its data.

yeah, patrick, i figured it out meanwhile.
i forgot to account for zl queue counting down while giving out its data.
that of course confused zl group.

If you want to achieve this with one object, I recommend using [mxj list.Queue]

or this way. you don't need to tell zl.group what length comes in. use the "done" bang from uzi to push out your list:

@zach: i probably avoid java, for portabilitys sake (the thing its intended for has to play nicely on windows too and i have zero experience with windows + java). but thanks for reminding me of the list.queue.

both thanks for the extension!
@zach: i probably avoid java, for portabilitys sake (the thing its intended for has to play nicely on windows too and i have zero experience with windows + java). but thanks for reminding me of the list.queue.
@mib thanks! fewer objects = better :-)

zl queue and group no happy team?