mr.l

is there any way to make a cornerpin object adapt to a gl.model?

I have several jit.gl.model objects. Each one reading a separate .dae (which are basically just planes) and then routing into individual cornerpin objects. (a jit.gl.node is in between).

My problem is, that the cornerpin takes the size of the window size and the model is sitting quite small inside of it. 

Can I make the cornerpin adapt to the model instead of the window size? 

loadbang

message

jit.gl.cornerpin

jit.gl.node

jit.gl.model

jit.window

toggle

qmetro

jit.gl.render

jit.movie

is there any way to make a cornerpin object  adapt to a gl.model?

I have several jit.gl.model objects. Each one reading a separate .dae (which are basically just planes) and then routing into individual cornerpin objects.  (a jit.gl.node is in between).
My problem is, that the cornerpin takes the size of the window size and the model is sitting quite small inside of it. 
Can I make the cornerpin adapt to the model instead of the window size? 

Thanks!
luke



Hey,
is there any way to make a cornerpin object  adapt to a gl.model?
I have several jit.gl.model objects. Each one reading a separate .dae

adapt-cornerpin-to-incoming-model

i'm not entirely sure what you are asking, but in general the solution is to make sure each node has adapt 0 and dims set to whatever output dims you want (if different then the window context dims), and each node has a jit.gl.camera bound to it.

the jit.gl.camera will handle proper viewport setting based on it's node's texture output dims.

i'm not entirely sure what you are asking, but in general the solution is to make sure each node has adapt 0 and dims set to whatever output dims you want (if different then the window context dims), and each node has a jit.gl.camera bound to it. 

the jit.gl.camera will handle proper viewport setting based on it's node's texture output dims.


thanks so much! Eventhough I do not understand why the camera needs to be bound to the node (or what it does), the adapt and dim do what I need.

To explain better I attach some screenshots.

In my original patch I loaded an object (also attached as s1.dae) and I got this result:

Shot1.png

Mapping this onto a real-life screen is a pain.

In your solution (with my corrected dim-adjustments) I get this:

Shot2.png

Shot3.png

That's more or less the other way around, as I meant.

I wondered if the cornerpin-object could adapt to what comes out of the jit.gl.node. Basically doing directly what is seen in screenshot3.

But I think I had a wrong understand of the cornerpin-object. As I understand now, the Upper-left 0. 0., upper-right 1. 0., lower-left 0. 1. and lower-right 1. 1. always descripe the corners of my final jit.window, right? 

In your patch the content of what comes out of the jit.gl.node fills up the entire cornerpin object and when I map it correctly to it's original size I shouldn't loose quality, right?

I am sorry, my english is not good enough to explain it better.

s1.DAE.zip

To explain better I attach some screenshots.
In my original patch I loaded an object (also attached as s1.dae) and I got this result:


Mapping this onto a real-life screen is a pain.

In your solution (with my corrected dim-adjustments) I get this:


That's more or less the other way around, as I meant.
I wondered if the cornerpin-object could adapt to what comes out of the jit.gl.node. Basically doing directly what is seen in screenshot3.
But I think I had a wrong understand of the cornerpin-object. As I understand now, the Upper-left 0. 0., upper-right 1. 0., lower-left 0. 1. and lower-right 1. 1. always descripe the corners of my final jit.window, right? 
In your patch the content of what comes out  of the jit.gl.node fills up the entire cornerpin object and when I map it correctly to it's original size I shouldn't loose quality, right?

I am sorry, my english is not good enough to explain it better.


adapt cornerpin to incoming model?