jit.la.mult input ordering


    Jun 23 2015 | 5:16 pm
    (Max 6.1.10 / 7.0.3)
    Maybe I'm being really dim here, but is the behaviour of jit.la.mult with respect to its inputs the reverse of matlab's?
    That is, in matlab if A is n-by-p and B is p-by-m then A*B gives an n*m matrix.
    Max Patcher
    In Max, select New From Clipboard.
    I'd guess I'd expected A to map to inlet 1, B to inlet 2, but it seems to be the other way round:
    Presumably this is intended behaviour – is there any chance the docs could be updated to make it clearer?