Max incorrectly (?) throws syntax error when using Object.defineProperty() with accessor descriptor

    Apr 02 2018 | 6:26 pm
    The Max implemenation of JS seems to support the Object.defineProperty() method. It correctly reads in and follows keys like value and writable when the data descriptor format is used.
    However, the other format used by Object.defineProperty(), the accessor descriptor, is either not supported, or is being rejected superficially due to a syntax error. From the Mozilla reference page, "The accessor descriptor is a property described by a getter-setter pair of functions", which is what I want to use, to define a custom setter/getter pair for a property.
    Here is a bit of sample code:
    var myObject = {};
    Object.defineProperty(myObject, 'a', {		
    	get () {
    		return a;
    	set (value) {
    		a = value;
    		post ("setting a to " + value);
    	enumerable: true,
    	configurable: true
    When the script is loaded, Max throws this error: js: master_control.js: Javascript SyntaxError: missing : after property id, line 4
    Now, I suspect that this error is being thrown simply because Max is looking for a colon, expecting the standard format key : value. Since Max plays nice with the data descriptor format, it seems to support the defineProperty method. But it won't load the script above, due to a supposed syntax error.
    Can anyone else confirm or deny this? Running Max 7.3.4 here, on OS X.
    Update: Reported this as a bug/issue to the devs, we'll see what they think.

    • Apr 09 2018 | 4:58 pm
      Found a sort-of workaround here:
      Which is to define custom setters and getters with an object literal:
      var myObject = { foo_value : "barky", get foo() { post("hey i'm going to return foo now...\n"); return (this.foo_value + " dog"); }, set foo(value) { this.foo_value = value; } }; post ( + "\n"); = "sleepy"; post ( + "\n"); The disadvantages to this approach are:
      1. The behavior of the virtual "foo" property can't be modified later after it is first declared (unlike using Object.defineProperty(), which allows creation OR modification of a property).
      2. Requires an extra property "foo_value" if you want to actually use the property "foo" as a storage space for values.
      At least, that's my understanding, as a JS novice.
    • Apr 23 2018 | 6:03 pm
      I did hear back from Cycling '74 support, and I'm happy to say the solution is to simply use an alternate syntax for the accessor descriptor. This solution now works for me: Object.defineProperty(myObject, 'a', { get: function() { return a; }, set: function(value) { a = value; post ("setting a to " + value); }, enumerable: true, configurable: true } );