i´searcing for netreceive external for max msp.

http://www.maxobjects.com/?v=objects&id_objet=1018&requested=udp&operateur=AND&id_plateforme=0&id_format=0&PHPSESSID=d6213badd2026f50577f06cd12cbebd6

The Link doesn´t wor. Could anyone send me this external?

netreceive-external-wanted-downloadsite-down

why not use a built in solution like udpreceive, jit.netreceive, or mxj netreceive ? that thing seems a bit outdated.

because i wants to receive from pure Data an some other aplications.

especially for networcing with pure Data netreceive works great!

because i wants to receive from pure Data an some other aplications.
especially for networcing with pure Data netreceive works great!

 to communicate with PD. Any UDP receiver vichung suggested will work. Besides his suggestions, there is also the 

You don't need netreceive to communicate with PD. Any UDP receiver vichung suggested will work. Besides his suggestions, there is also the $Adam library (usefull for TCP).


I´ve tried a lot... I dont work... Or I´ve made some mistakes.

I´ve seen a Youtubetutorial PD MaxMSP communication: this way is very simple and it works...

If someone has Tips wich objects are working, i´ll try it. ;)

i don't know about the exact object you're looking for, it seems deprecated... you should maybe try other solutions like the sadam library and use the sadam.netReceive external, then decode the output using atoi fromsymbol regexp fromsymbol

it's boring, but it kind of works, maybe someone will have that object but...

ok
i don't know about the exact object you're looking for, it seems deprecated... you should maybe try other solutions like the sadam library and use the sadam.netReceive external, then decode the output using atoi fromsymbol regexp fromsymbol
it's boring, but it kind of works, maybe someone will have that object but...


@Patrick : as unsettling as it sounds, udpreceive doesn't work... i get this message using netsend :

udpreceive: OSC Bad message name string: DataAfterAlignedString: Unreasonably long string

If i use CNMAT format and OpenSoundControl i get a 

DataAfterAlignedString: Unreasonably long string

); OpenSoundControl doesn't seem to be able to decode this.

printit: received MESSAGE "FullPacket" (0x238a56dc, s_thing 0x0) with 2 argument(s):

but the size is only 8 bytes, so I won't try to print it.

udpreceive: OSC Bad message name string: DataAfterAlignedString: Unreasonably long string
Dropping entire message.


If i use CNMAT format and OpenSoundControl i get a DataAfterAlignedString: Unreasonably long string
though i get an osc packet (it prints FullPacket 8 639655792); OpenSoundControl doesn't seem to be able to decode this.

printit: received MESSAGE "FullPacket" (0x238a56dc, s_thing 0x0) with 2 argument(s):
printit:  LONG   8
printit:  LONG   599960744
printit: It looks like an OSC packet
but the size is only 8 bytes, so I won't try to print it.


there's that maybe ? http://www.nullmedium.de/dev/netsend~/


Thanks, but i need netreceive and without ~ ;)

I guess sadam lib is your best bet at the moment !

Ok, now i´m receiving Data from PD over udp in Max:

I wants to send numers and I´m receiving with sadam udp.receiver (the postet patch obove) Data.

But i send float: 100 and receive: some pairs of numbers:

Sending: "100" Receiving with Sadam this:

sending 200 for example, i´ll receive exactly:

How to format this, that i receive my "200" ???

I wants to send numers and I´m receiving with sadam udp.receiver (the postet patch obove) Data. 

But i send float: 100 and receive: some pairs of numbers:
Sending: "100" Receiving with Sadam this:
"120 120 32 49 48 48 59 10"  

sending 200 for example, i´ll receive exactly:
"120 120 32 50 48 48 59 10"

I´m able to send values from MaxMSP with [netsend 1]to Max and receive this with Samdam: The patch postest in this topic above.

now, with unpacking it works fine:
I´m able to send values from MaxMSP with [netsend 1]to Max and receive this with Samdam: The patch postest in this topic above.


edit : ninja'd - seems alright now - if i understood well.

handling [itoa] object was the solution. Now, it works!

Puredata [netsend] and [netreceive] objects are using FUDI protocol over tcp or udp (just as Pd itself internally to communicate between GUI and core).

Those are different from [tcpsend], [tcpreceive], [udpsend] or [udpreceive] (from mrpeach or iemnet lib) with which you can send or receive raw byte data from/in puredata.

In Max, [udpreceive] and [udpsend] are using OSC at least since Max 5.0.8.

So I guess, it would have been more clear to call them [oscreceive] and [oscsend].

Or even [oscoverudpsend] [oscoverudpreceive], but I agree this is a long name for something that is simple to use.

So to replace the missing [netreceive] in Max, you have to use (since I can't find any alternative) the Sadam library.

And as it has been already said, put a [itoa] after it to convert the raw byte to human-readable messages.

But please note that I can't make it work in TCP, which is quite a pity since Pd is using it unless you tell it to use UDP.

just to clarify :
Puredata [netsend] and [netreceive] objects are using FUDI protocol over tcp or udp (just as Pd itself internally to communicate between GUI and core).
Those are different from [tcpsend], [tcpreceive], [udpsend] or [udpreceive] (from mrpeach or iemnet lib) with which you can send or receive raw byte data from/in puredata.
Please see [1] for FUDI reference.

In Max, [udpreceive] and [udpsend] are using OSC at least since Max 5.0.8.
So I guess, it would have been more clear to call them [oscreceive] and [oscsend].
Or even [oscoverudpsend] [oscoverudpreceive], but I agree this is a long name for something that is simple to use.

So to replace the missing [netreceive] in Max, you have to use (since I can't find any alternative) the Sadam library.
And as it has been already said, put a [itoa] after it to convert the raw byte to human-readable messages.

A.
[1] : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUDI


When sending from pd to max via udp, this has been the only solution I've found:

Screen Shot 2020-12-05 at 3.06.34 PM.png

Let me know if you can think of a more elegant solution. (or where mine will fall short)

regarding the other way around I posted here.
Let me know if you can think of a more elegant solution. (or where mine will fall short)
Best

netreceive-external wanted, Downloadsite down