florent colautti

on a M4L patch, i have several instances of a patcher — like 8 copy of the same patch, references by individual argument—.

The content of the bpatcher contain different object with scripting name edit (like Level, duration, intensity...) for identification and mostly for find them back on the automation list. 

so, the automation list report all the Live object like : Level, Level[1], , Level[2], Level[3], [...] , Level[8] BUT they're totally scramble !!!! the Level[2] is not the one on my 3rd bpatcher... so it's the mess and have to mix my mind for find who is who !

try rename them with other name, and other different stuff but still the same...

Is there a way to "force" M4L to stay in order or someone have a trick or tips for manage that kind of issue !!!

on a M4L patch, i have several instances of a patcher — like 8 copy of the same patch, references by individual argument—.
The content of the bpatcher contain different object with scripting name edit (like Level, duration, intensity...) for identification and mostly  for find them back on the automation list. 
so, the automation list report all the Live object like : Level, Level[1], , Level[2], Level[3], [...] , Level[8]  BUT they're totally scramble !!!! the Level[2] is not the one on my 3rd bpatcher... so it's the mess and have to mix my mind for find who is who !
try rename them with other name, and other different stuff but still the same...

Hi All
on a M4L patch, i have several instances of a patcher — like 8 copy of the same patch, references by individual argument—.
The conten

subpath-index-in-order-in-m4l

Having exactly the same problem here but I'm using different instances of a patcher inside [poly~] !

subpath index in order in M4L