Clément HUBERT

I am faced to a problem with a pak object.

I need to link 128 float values from a patch called "angles" to an other called "meters". If I change a value in one of the patch I want it to be modified in the second patch. 

So I used a combinaison of pak, unpack and prepend (set) objects and it works quite well. 

But, if I initialize all the values in a patch with message objects and if I modify then one value in one of the patch, the other floats come back to their former value while I don't want them to move. As if the pak object in the "angles" patch stored the other values and sent it when it received the one modified value.

I don't know if it's clear enough so I made a little patch that reproduce the same problem but only with 2 integer values and an initialize bang.

Have you any idea of what could prevent this ?

Hi guys,

I am faced to a problem with a pak object.

I need to link 128 float values from a patch called "angles" to an other called "meters". If I change a value in one of the patch I want it to be modified in the second patch. 
So I used a combinaison of pak, unpack and prepend (set) objects and it works quite well. 
But, if I initialize all the values in a patch with message objects and if I modify then one value in one of the patch, the other floats come back to their former value while I don't want them to move. As if the pak object in the "angles" patch stored the other values and sent it when it received  the one modified value.

I don't know if it's clear enough so I made a little patch that reproduce the same problem but only with 2 integer values and an initialize bang.
Have you any idea of what could prevent this ?

Hi guys,

I am faced to a problem with a pak object.

I need to link 128 float values from a patch called "angles" to an other called "meter

alternative-to-pak-that-doesn't-"store"-values

Yes sorry didn't know how to share it properly. Thanks

I'm not sure I understand the problem, but maybe the value object would be of help.

here is a little modification of Your patch

Yes thank you very much Source Audio ! It works as it :)

Alternative to pak that doesn't "store" values